Go Back   BearcatTalk.com > Cincinnati Football > Bearcat Football
Home Register Community FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-02-2010, 04:56 PM   #31
swg
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,155
swg is a jewel in the roughswg is a jewel in the roughswg is a jewel in the rough
Analyzing the Rankings

Here are the teams that finished first in any of the eight rankings and how many first-place nods they received:

Cincinnati: 3 (QB, WR, TE)

Pittsburgh: 2 (RB, DL)

Connecticut: 2 (OL, LB)

West Virginia: 1 (DB).

I've been saying all along that these four teams are the top four contenders, and that Cincinnati had the best offense. Those rankings bear that out.

Now here's how many times each team appeared in the upper half, or top four, of the group rankings:

Pittsburgh: 7 (Everything but TE)

West Virginia: 7 (Everything but QB)

Rutgers 6 (TE, WR, DL, LB, DB, QB)

Connecticut: 5 (QB, RB, OL, LB, TE)

Cincinnati: 5 (QB, WR, TE, RB, OL)

South Florida: 1 (DL)

Syracuse: 1 (DB)

Louisville: 0

Not a lot of real surprises here. We knew that Pitt and West Virginia have a lot of returning experienced talent, along with UConn and Cincinnati. Rutgers fared a little better than I would have expected, while South Florida fared much worse than I would have thought. The lack of elite talent at Syracuse and Louisville is reflected in these rankings.

Finally, here are how the teams stand when you add each team's position group placement together (awarding eight points for first, seven for second, etc.)

1. West Virginia: 50 points
2. Pittsburgh: 49
3. Cincinnati: 45
4. Connecticut: 44
5. Rutgers: 38
6. South Florida: 25
7. Syracuse: 22
8. Louisville: 16
swg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 04:57 PM   #32
swg
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,155
swg is a jewel in the roughswg is a jewel in the roughswg is a jewel in the rough
I don't see WV being able to stop the UC offense. Pitt might be able to, but they are likewise breaking in a new QB. This year is wide open for the top three.
swg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 05:44 PM   #33
JasonS
Football Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,181
JasonS has a spectacular aura aboutJasonS has a spectacular aura aboutJasonS has a spectacular aura about
We will know after game number 3 if this defense will be good enough to win a Big East Championship. I, personally, think it is and will be better than last year. A lot of the guys that saw minutes last year were freshmen (especially in the secondary) and you can expect to see a major jump in their play this year. It's amazing, how this team could be positioned a year from now. The offense will have most of it's firepower back and the defense will be very experienced. If the Bearcats can win the Big East this year, we could be looking at 4 Big East Championships in a row.
JasonS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
big east, qb rankings



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., - All material on this Cincinnati Bearcat discussion forum is strictly for entertainment purposes only. This site and any pages within are in no way affiliated with the University of Cincinnati. Any images, copyrights, or trademarks used on this site are used under the "Fair Use Provision" of the Copyright Act for purposes of comment, criticism, and news reporting.