11-23-2015, 07:49 PM | #41 |
Elite Member
|
Am I a bad fan for putting down 5$ on Xavier at 250-1 strictly for an emotional hedge?
Fwiw, my futures are 50$ on UC at 66-1 5$ on X at 250-1 15$ on Miami at 50-1 Basically lottery tickets but should be fun sweats. |
11-23-2015, 07:53 PM | #42 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,278
|
|
11-23-2015, 07:53 PM | #43 |
Epic Member
|
Well, seeing how Xavier always gets the easiest path to the sweet 16, anything is possible.
|
11-23-2015, 08:03 PM | #44 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17,011
|
|
11-23-2015, 08:10 PM | #45 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17,011
|
|
11-23-2015, 08:23 PM | #46 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: #DumpMick
Posts: 7,333
|
At 250-1, Xavier is good value. They are really good, especially on offense. At the very least, I like watching them play. I think at least one of the team's you bet on will make the Sweet 16.
|
11-26-2015, 07:50 PM | #47 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17,011
|
I got Iowa -1.5 against Dayton.
|
11-27-2015, 10:44 AM | #48 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17,011
|
DraftKings $ Today
Clark $6,700 Ellis $6,200 Caupain $5,700 Shaq $5,200 Cobb $5,000 Evans $4,500 KJ $3,700 DeBerry $3,200 Jenifer $3,000 Quadri $3,000 They have Scott and Washington at $3,00 too for some reason. |
11-27-2015, 11:12 AM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 423
|
Something feels dirty betting on individual college players
|
11-27-2015, 11:44 AM | #50 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17,011
|
Ha yeah I agree. If these sites operated like offshore sites or sportsbokks with gambling licenses, it wouldn't be much different than player props. But they don't. So I get why states are banning it. I know Nevada banned it, but basically just said they need to play by the same rules.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|