|
View Poll Results: What seed will UC get? | |||
1-2 | 9 | 14.52% | |
3 | 27 | 43.55% | |
4 | 15 | 24.19% | |
5 | 9 | 14.52% | |
6 | 2 | 3.23% | |
7 or worse | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-19-2018, 08:48 AM | #81 |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,395
|
Sure, but that's also true of other teams at the top. If Purdue beats Michigan St and Ohio St, then the Big Ten really only has one "marquee" team. If Auburn beats Kentucky, then the SEC only has one "marquee" team despite being really a solid conference.
|
01-19-2018, 08:58 AM | #82 |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
|
Of course they will. Column 1 can include a win away against #75 or #1. The committee should and will treat them differently as they are fine tuning seed lines.
|
01-19-2018, 08:58 AM | #83 |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
|
true true...but WSU is the ONLY team we have to do this with. We need WSU to stay as high in the ranking as we can...while still beating them...lol! We don't need them losing any more games outside of UC right now.
Last edited by waterhead; 01-19-2018 at 09:09 AM. |
01-19-2018, 09:00 AM | #84 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17,011
|
Well then what's the point of making the groups at all? And why set the parameters that way if there are such big differences within a group? I don't get that. A Group 1 win should be a Group 1 win should be a Group 1 win. If it isn't looked at that way, then they shouldn't have set it up like that.
|
01-19-2018, 09:05 AM | #85 | |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
|
Quote:
We also haven't played a single game in our true home arena which I would hope the committee will be aware of. It's not a true home game and also not a true neutral game. |
|
01-19-2018, 09:12 AM | #86 | |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,395
|
Quote:
|
|
01-19-2018, 09:12 AM | #87 | |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17,011
|
Quote:
|
|
01-19-2018, 09:14 AM | #88 | |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,329
|
Quote:
yeah i dont really like it. its another way for them to choose to use certain criteria for specific teams. for a blue blood school they might only want to look at group 1 record. for a non power 5 then they might start to break down where in group 1 the actual teams are. when they first came out with the groupings my first thought was "oh a win at duke is the same as a win at UCF now"? obviously that would be silly. |
|
01-19-2018, 09:14 AM | #89 | |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17,011
|
Quote:
I agree with you. I think they should be very important. It is the top group after all. |
|
01-19-2018, 09:16 AM | #90 | |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
|
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|