Go Back   BearcatTalk.com > Cincinnati Basketball > Bearcat Basketball
Home Register Community FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: What seed will UC get?
1-2 9 14.52%
3 27 43.55%
4 15 24.19%
5 9 14.52%
6 2 3.23%
7 or worse 0 0%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-23-2018, 08:01 AM   #121
waterhead
Senior Moderator
 
waterhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
waterhead is on a distinguished road
It's interesting to see the difference between voter polls and Bracket Matrix in how it relates to preferred conferences.

Specifically Clemson and Auburn. These are not two blue blood brand names (in basketball). They are ranked 17 and 18 in the AP but are listed as 3 seeds in Bracket Matrix. Their AP rank would "suggest" a 5 seed. UC ranked 9th is listed as a 4 seed but they are closing in on a "suggested" 2 seed.

I think Auburn moved up a seed after a week which included a loss and Clemson stayed put with a loss. Meanwhile we moved up 1 spot over...you guessed it...WSU. Auburn jumped us with a loss and picked up no big wins.
waterhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2018, 09:25 AM   #122
kskenyon4
Elite Member
 
kskenyon4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 520
kskenyon4 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterhead View Post
It's interesting to see the difference between voter polls and Bracket Matrix in how it relates to preferred conferences.

Specifically Clemson and Auburn. These are not two blue blood brand names (in basketball). They are ranked 17 and 18 in the AP but are listed as 3 seeds in Bracket Matrix. Their AP rank would "suggest" a 5 seed. UC ranked 9th is listed as a 4 seed but they are closing in on a "suggested" 2 seed.

I think Auburn moved up a seed after a week which included a loss and Clemson stayed put with a loss. Meanwhile we moved up 1 spot over...you guessed it...WSU. Auburn jumped us with a loss and picked up no big wins.
They both boast top 10 RPI's, which of course AP voters don't care anything about. Obviously Clemson losing a major player for the year to injury, I full expect them to NOT be a 2-4 seed. Not to mention they lost to Temple.

Coincidentally enough, Auburn has lost to Temple and does not have any major wins as far as media goes, but 4 Quadrant 1 wins. They're definitely a team to monitor that will be fighting UC for a seed line.

Other teams I now track:

UNC (lost last night)
OSU (won last night)
Oklahoma
Arizona
West Virginia (lost last night)
Texas Tech
Tennessee
Florida
kskenyon4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2018, 10:01 AM   #123
sedziobs
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,395
sedziobs is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by kskenyon4 View Post
Auburn has ... 4 Quadrant 1 wins.
As of right now, Auburn is 3-2 in Group 1, but two of those games (Temple, at Miss St) are projected to fall out of Group 1. They have six expected Group 1 games left on the schedule though. I think Auburn has a slightly better resume than we do at the moment.
sedziobs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2018, 10:03 AM   #124
kskenyon4
Elite Member
 
kskenyon4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 520
kskenyon4 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sedziobs View Post
As of right now, Auburn is 3-2 in Group 1, but two of those games (Temple, at Miss St) are projected to fall out of Group 1. They have six expected Group 1 games left on the schedule though. I think Auburn has a slightly better resume than we do at the moment.
Arkansas fell from 30 to 32 this morning, so that is on the border of a quadrant 1 win.
kskenyon4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2018, 10:07 AM   #125
sedziobs
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,395
sedziobs is on a distinguished road
Yep, and Miss St is at 75, exactly on the cut line. Temple is at 46, just barely in. At least according to rpiforecast, none of those three teams will end up in Group 1 though.
sedziobs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2018, 10:20 AM   #126
sedziobs
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,395
sedziobs is on a distinguished road
Looking at the other 4 seeds on bracketmatrix. I think we have a better resume than Arizona. We're both 4-2 in Group 1, and we both have some wins toward the bottom of that Group that are in danger of falling out. However, Arizona has a pair of Group 2 losses, where we are clean so far.

I also think we're ahead of Ohio St. They have just a single Group 1 win, which is at the bottom of the Group. They are an impressive 8-1 in Group 2, but I don't think that overcomes our four Group 1 wins.

I would put us about even with Texas Tech. They are 3-3 in Group 1, but with some better wins within the Group than ours. That's balanced out by their Group 2 loss.

As previously mentioned, I think we're below Auburn, the worst 3 seed. So by my estimation we're 13-14 on the S curve right now.
sedziobs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2018, 10:25 AM   #127
Jon Rycek
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,183
Jon Rycek is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sedziobs View Post
Looking at the other 4 seeds on bracketmatrix. I think we have a better resume than Arizona. We're both 4-2 in Group 1, and we both have some wins toward the bottom of that Group that are in danger of falling out. However, Arizona has a pair of Group 2 losses, where we are clean so far.

I also think we're ahead of Ohio St. They have just a single Group 1 win, which is at the bottom of the Group. They are an impressive 8-1 in Group 2, but I don't think that overcomes our four Group 1 wins.

I would put us about even with Texas Tech. They are 3-3 in Group 1, but with some better wins within the Group than ours. That's balanced out by their Group 2 loss.

As previously mentioned, I think we're below Auburn, the worst 3 seed. So by my estimation we're 13-14 on the S curve right now.
Yeah just leave it to RPI to give OSU more credit for losing to only good teams then actually beating anyone other than MSU.
Jon Rycek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2018, 10:26 AM   #128
Jon Rycek
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,183
Jon Rycek is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterhead View Post
It's interesting to see the difference between voter polls and Bracket Matrix in how it relates to preferred conferences.

Specifically Clemson and Auburn. These are not two blue blood brand names (in basketball). They are ranked 17 and 18 in the AP but are listed as 3 seeds in Bracket Matrix. Their AP rank would "suggest" a 5 seed. UC ranked 9th is listed as a 4 seed but they are closing in on a "suggested" 2 seed.

I think Auburn moved up a seed after a week which included a loss and Clemson stayed put with a loss. Meanwhile we moved up 1 spot over...you guessed it...WSU. Auburn jumped us with a loss and picked up no big wins.
I was very surprised to see them both in a seed line above us. Goes to show we have some work to do if we want to cement ourselves into a nice seed. I really think 3 is so much better than a four. Especially this year. I don't see any two seeds being that big of a threat.
Jon Rycek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2018, 10:44 AM   #129
waterhead
Senior Moderator
 
waterhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
waterhead is on a distinguished road
RPI forecast says we have an 82%-95% chance against 8 of our next 12 opponents. 7 of 8 is 87.5%. Probability would say we probably lose 1. The remaining 4 games are between 46% and 68% so probability would say we probably lose 2...since winning 3 of 4 is 75%.

If we are going to get a protected seed...I think we will have to win up until the point we play @ SMU and @ Hou. We will need to take one of those games. Then we need to win the home game vs WSU.

We are going to have a target on our back the whole time. It's not going to be easy. We play away on SR night the last two games against WSU and Tulane. If we can manage 2 losses or less I think we have a protected seed without a doubt. If we lose any more...we may need some help.

Make no mistake 2 more losses (or less) would be a GREAT finish! 3 more losses would not be embarrassing but not sure if we can ensure a protected seed that way.

Last edited by waterhead; 01-23-2018 at 10:50 AM.
waterhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2018, 09:31 AM   #130
sedziobs
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,395
sedziobs is on a distinguished road
Blind resume test:

Team A: 4-2 Group 1, 3-0 Group 2, no bad losses
Team B: 4-2 Group 1, 3-0 Group 2, no bad losses
sedziobs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., - All material on this Cincinnati Bearcat discussion forum is strictly for entertainment purposes only. This site and any pages within are in no way affiliated with the University of Cincinnati. Any images, copyrights, or trademarks used on this site are used under the "Fair Use Provision" of the Copyright Act for purposes of comment, criticism, and news reporting.