05-26-2015, 03:16 PM | #21 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,329
|
|
05-26-2015, 03:18 PM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,278
|
|
05-26-2015, 03:19 PM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,278
|
|
05-26-2015, 03:27 PM | #24 | |
Elite Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 844
|
Quote:
Mick wouldn't offer the top 100 scholarships if he didn't want them. I don't think it's unreasonable to discuss/debate why we don't land more of them. |
|
05-26-2015, 03:31 PM | #25 | |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,329
|
Quote:
There is absolutely no doubt there are recruits of all rankings that will not go to a slow tempo school. That does not mean all good players won't do it. That is silly. |
|
05-26-2015, 03:31 PM | #26 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17,011
|
They go hand in hand. Unless you shoot 20 3s per game with a team where every player shoots them. If we had that, I wouldn't mind our pace at all. Wisconsin was #1 in the country in offensive efficiency. We weren't Top 100.
|
05-26-2015, 03:35 PM | #27 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,120
|
I'm with the "picking up the pace a little would be nice, but we need to be more efficient with our possessions, rather than worrying about how many shots to put up" people, if such a group exists.
|
05-26-2015, 03:41 PM | #28 |
Elite Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 844
|
I agree with you. I'm saying it could limit the pool of interested recruits not slash it to zero.
|
05-26-2015, 03:43 PM | #29 |
Elite Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 844
|
|
05-26-2015, 03:43 PM | #30 | |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,329
|
Quote:
The offense needs to be better. Yes it needs to score more points. Everybody agrees it needs to score more points. But they can do that staying at 60 possessions per game if Mick chooses to still play that slow. |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|