Go Back   BearcatTalk.com > Cincinnati Basketball > Bearcat Basketball

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-18-2017, 12:38 PM   #21
GuyfromNKY
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Ludlow
Posts: 221
GuyfromNKY is on a distinguished road
Here are the offensive ratings per KenPom:

Gary Clark 152.6
Justin Jenifer 149.6
Trevon Scott 144.4
Jarron Cumberland 139.3
Jacob Evans 131.1
Trevor Moore 125.7
Cane Broome 117.0
Mamoudou Diarra 111.2
Kyle Washington 105.5
Nysier Brooks 102.6
Keith Williams 96.3
Eliel Nsoseme 77.7
GuyfromNKY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2017, 07:05 PM   #22
ervins84
Elite Member
 
ervins84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 794
ervins84 will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to ervins84 Send a message via Skype™ to ervins84
Per www.hoop-math.com 32.7% of our attempts have been in transition.

For perspective, previous years:
20.7%
22.8%
20.1%


Also per kpom we've averaged 14.1 seconds per offensive possession, which is 21st in the country.

For comparison, last year was 18.7 seconds and 303rd in the country.

Also should be noted were 5th in the nation in Offensive Rebounding percentage. This means we're ACTUALLY EVEN FASTER than 14.1 seconds because an offensive rebound does not start a new possession, but merely extends the possession according to their way of tracking data.
ervins84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2017, 08:39 PM   #23
justinhub2003
Epic Member
 
justinhub2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,583
justinhub2003 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ervins84 View Post
Per www.hoop-math.com 32.7% of our attempts have been in transition.

For perspective, previous years:
20.7%
22.8%
20.1%


Also per kpom we've averaged 14.1 seconds per offensive possession, which is 21st in the country.

For comparison, last year was 18.7 seconds and 303rd in the country.

Also should be noted were 5th in the nation in Offensive Rebounding percentage. This means we're ACTUALLY EVEN FASTER than 14.1 seconds because an offensive rebound does not start a new possession, but merely extends the possession according to their way of tracking data.
I think possession time on offense ramps up to 16 second per possession when we get into tougher games. 16 would still be one of the faster power teams in the country
justinhub2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2017, 09:10 PM   #24
cincrulz11
Epic Member
 
cincrulz11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,329
cincrulz11 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ervins84 View Post
Per www.hoop-math.com 32.7% of our attempts have been in transition.

For perspective, previous years:
20.7%
22.8%
20.1%

can you look at stuff like after 4 games say 2 seasons ago. our first 4 games were against dumpster teams like this year and we scored 97, 106, 83, and 99. then game 5 came vs the powerhouse SE Louisiana and we put up 64.


im always going to want to see it before i believe it over the course of a full season.
cincrulz11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2017, 08:12 AM   #25
jacobkdoyle
Epic Member
 
jacobkdoyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17,011
jacobkdoyle is on a distinguished road
PER through 6 games

Clark 33.4
Diarra 26.3
Washington 21.2
Evans 20.8
Broome 20.2
Cumberland 19.9
Scott 19.4
Jenifer 17.8
Moore 17.2
Brooks 11.9
Williams 7.5
Nsoseme 5.4
jacobkdoyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2017, 08:31 AM   #26
ervins84
Elite Member
 
ervins84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 794
ervins84 will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to ervins84 Send a message via Skype™ to ervins84
Quote:
Originally Posted by cincrulz11 View Post
can you look at stuff like after 4 games say 2 seasons ago. our first 4 games were against dumpster teams like this year and we scored 97, 106, 83, and 99. then game 5 came vs the powerhouse SE Louisiana and we put up 64.


im always going to want to see it before i believe it over the course of a full season.
I don't think you can unfortunately. At least I don't know how to...

Obv those are gonna drop somewhat, even more so because teams aren't going to try and run with us and will probably try to control tempo.

Last edited by ervins84; 11-23-2017 at 08:33 AM.
ervins84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2017, 09:41 PM   #27
jacobkdoyle
Epic Member
 
jacobkdoyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17,011
jacobkdoyle is on a distinguished road
PER
Clark 30.2
Diarra 25.1
Evans 21.1
Broome 19.7
Washington 19.3
Scott 17.7
Moore 17.2
Cumberland 15.9
Brooks 15.8
Jenifer 13.3
Williams 9.7
Nsoseme 8.2
jacobkdoyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2017, 09:49 PM   #28
jacobkdoyle
Epic Member
 
jacobkdoyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17,011
jacobkdoyle is on a distinguished road
Is there a Team PER stat? I'd like to see our year by year Team PER. Not just averaging everyone on our team, but weighting it by % of minutes played.
jacobkdoyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 02:31 PM   #29
jacobkdoyle
Epic Member
 
jacobkdoyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17,011
jacobkdoyle is on a distinguished road
2014-15 Team PER: 16.6

2015-16 Team PER: 18.4

2016-17 Team PER: 18.4

2017-18 Team PER: 18.3

I think the starters this year will start to take a higher % of the minutes, so the number will reflect that more and more as the year goes on. Our bench is playing over 40% of the minutes this year. Last year the bench played about 27% of the minutes.

Last edited by jacobkdoyle; 12-11-2017 at 02:37 PM.
jacobkdoyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 09:21 AM   #30
waterhead
Senior Moderator
 
waterhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
waterhead is on a distinguished road
I think we shot ourselves in the foot big time with that Florida game. There were a lot of losses in front of us that week. This week not a lot of losses in front of us. We could have climbed 5 spots if we beat FLA when we were 17 but now we are 25 and aren't going to climb that much in the polls. Probably close to a 10 spot difference in rankings if we beat FLA.

Oh well...I think we found a nice groove in the past couple of games between great D and decent O.
waterhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., - All material on this Cincinnati Bearcat discussion forum is strictly for entertainment purposes only. This site and any pages within are in no way affiliated with the University of Cincinnati. Any images, copyrights, or trademarks used on this site are used under the "Fair Use Provision" of the Copyright Act for purposes of comment, criticism, and news reporting.