Looking at it slightly differently, we're in the more expense/less wins quadrant from 2013-17
I guess this begs the question for an A.D. of how many wins to expect based on a promised investment in the budget?
This chart is answering a question that, over a period of time, has the program gotten better at spending money in order to achieve more? For UC I think the answer is no. They don't spend anywhere near what other programs do, but relative to the increases in expense, they have not achieved a greater return on investment.