Quote:
Originally Posted by jacobkdoyle
First bolded part: What are you basing that on? What you hope?
Second bolded part: That's why I said obviously different situations and different roster makeup. But it's still a big gap to close.
I don't see what's so negative about my post tbh. Sorry I don't buy into things blindly? And you once again seem to not realize that the biggest collapse in NCAA Tournament history changes things for some people. Not you, obviously. But for some of us, it really creates doubt. Especially when the returning team only accounted for 50% of the scoring for a program that struggles for offense.
I'm not going to be all rainbows and sunshine. So probably stop reading my posts. Especially if the one above is even too much for you to handle.
This isn't a propaganda site. And if you think UC fans aren't/shouldn't be concerned about next season, you have your head buried in the sand.
|
I wouldn't be concerned based on the fact that every year we lose players and yet every year we are back in the tournament.
I kind of agree with the SK senior year comparison. It is similar in that our offense will flow through one player (Cumberland) but our offense especially in the backcourt is going to be much better next year compared to SK's senior season. Backcourt's rule college basketball and we are going to have an above average one next year with Cumberland and Broome.