Go Back   BearcatTalk.com > Cincinnati Basketball > Bearcat Basketball

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-09-2020, 01:04 PM   #91
skyblade
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,790
skyblade is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsamemario View Post
Mcneal does all the right things? He cant stay in front of his man. He turns the ball over. He dribbled for 8 seconds last night at the 3 point line and then threw up an awful shot at the end of the shot clock. This is the norm for mcneal. He played 1 good game and that was the loss at ohio state.

But I guess I dont understand how you can say that about mcneal and then the very next sentence say harvey cant shoot or defend. Mcneal cant do either and hes been in college for 6 years
Harvey has showed no indications that he can hit a 3 with any consistency. And Harvey's defense has been terrible, he was in the game for 3 minutes last night and committed a holding foul because he couldn't stay in front of his man. Harvey should get there eventually (Williams was very similar as a freshman and figured it out by his Sophomore year), but I don't think he can be counted on for minutes this year.

McNeal has been a quite capable defender and very good at forcing TO's and getting steals at times. Offensively he is majorly lacking, but he brings more then Harvey and probably will continue to this year. I have much more hope in Davenport figuring it out by March then I do in Harvey.
skyblade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2020, 01:35 PM   #92
Loser Mentality
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 134
Loser Mentality is on a distinguished road
McNeal needs a confidence booster bad.

Last nights 2 Cumberlands, Williams, Scott, and Vogt may have just crushed the confidence booster lol for McNeal going forward.
Loser Mentality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2020, 07:54 AM   #93
Alum2013
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,239
Alum2013 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyblade View Post
Harvey has showed no indications that he can hit a 3 with any consistency. And Harvey's defense has been terrible, he was in the game for 3 minutes last night and committed a holding foul because he couldn't stay in front of his man. Harvey should get there eventually (Williams was very similar as a freshman and figured it out by his Sophomore year), but I don't think he can be counted on for minutes this year.

McNeal has been a quite capable defender and very good at forcing TO's and getting steals at times. Offensively he is majorly lacking, but he brings more then Harvey and probably will continue to this year. I have much more hope in Davenport figuring it out by March then I do in Harvey.
This. I don't understand how anyone could watch what Harvey has done so far this year and think he should be getting more minutes. He has been terrible. McNeal has been equally as terrible offensively but at least on defense he's definitely one of our better ones.
Alum2013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2020, 08:03 AM   #94
cincyguy13
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4,633
cincyguy13 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alum2013 View Post
This. I don't understand how anyone could watch what Harvey has done so far this year and think he should be getting more minutes. He has been terrible. McNeal has been equally as terrible offensively but at least on defense he's definitely one of our better ones.
The same guy wanted minutes for diarra when he looked equally as terrible.
The thought with giving Harvey a couple minutes, not much, is that the game will begin to slow down and maybe he will get some confidence. He is 18 years old and a big part of the programs future. McNeal is 22-23 years old. Is what he is. And Harvey can’t be much worse in limited time.
cincyguy13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2020, 08:05 AM   #95
waterhead
Senior Moderator
 
waterhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
waterhead is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alum2013 View Post
This. I don't understand how anyone could watch what Harvey has done so far this year and think he should be getting more minutes. He has been terrible. McNeal has been equally as terrible offensively but at least on defense he's definitely one of our better ones.
Harvey is a frosh so I expect a big jump next year. I don't know what is going on with McNeal (must be mental) he must have done enough in practice and early games to prove something to Brannen. If he could just shoot his career average from 3 I would think he would still be in there. Moore really never gained his confidence back once he lost it. If McNeal keeps working on his shot after practice maybe a light will come on. I remember Terry Nelson saying McNeal was a very capable shooter after watching practices. Something has gone terribly wrong since then
waterhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2020, 08:06 AM   #96
cincyguy13
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4,633
cincyguy13 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyblade View Post
Harvey has showed no indications that he can hit a 3 with any consistency. And Harvey's defense has been terrible, he was in the game for 3 minutes last night and committed a holding foul because he couldn't stay in front of his man. Harvey should get there eventually (Williams was very similar as a freshman and figured it out by his Sophomore year), but I don't think he can be counted on for minutes this year.

McNeal has been a quite capable defender and very good at forcing TO's and getting steals at times. Offensively he is majorly lacking, but he brings more then Harvey and probably will continue to this year. I have much more hope in Davenport figuring it out by March then I do in Harvey.
Diarra also looked terrible at the beginning of the year but you wanted him in there. Guess people think Harvey could also get better. But since he’s not your favorite player, I guess He can’t improve.
cincyguy13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2020, 08:09 AM   #97
itsamemario
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 165
itsamemario is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterhead View Post
Harvey is a frosh so I expect a big jump next year. I don't know what is going on with McNeal (must be mental) he must have done enough in practice and early games to prove something to Brannen. If he could just shoot his career average from 3 I would think he would still be in there. Moore really never gained his confidence back once he lost it. If McNeal keeps working on his shot after practice maybe a light will come on. I remember Terry Nelson saying McNeal was a very capable shooter after watching practices. Something has gone terribly wrong since then
I dont think its mental. Hes just not good. Hes a 6 year career 28% shooter from 3. Im not yelling for Harvey to play more, Im yelling for Mcneal to play less. However that works. If that means play MAW in foul trouble or play Dou at the 1. I dont care, but Mcneal cant be on the floor for any extended periods.
itsamemario is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2020, 08:17 AM   #98
cincyguy13
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4,633
cincyguy13 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsamemario View Post
I dont think its mental. Hes just not good. Hes a 6 year career 28% shooter from 3. Im not yelling for Harvey to play more, Im yelling for Mcneal to play less. However that works. If that means play MAW in foul trouble or play Dou at the 1. I dont care, but Mcneal cant be on the floor for any extended periods.
I am also for McNeal playing less. I think his best use is playing defense for a couple minutes and getting the other point guard wore out. Or in the press when we are down. Like Iowa. Other than that, we are better without him.
cincyguy13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2020, 08:36 AM   #99
cincrulz11
Epic Member
 
cincrulz11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,329
cincrulz11 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsamemario View Post
I dont think its mental. Hes just not good. Hes a 6 year career 28% shooter from 3. Im not yelling for Harvey to play more, Im yelling for Mcneal to play less. However that works. If that means play MAW in foul trouble or play Dou at the 1. I dont care, but Mcneal cant be on the floor for any extended periods.

28% is bad, but he's not an 11% 3 point shooter which is what he is this year.



obviously nobody wants a 28% 3 point shooter hoisting up 3's either, which is also why nobody should ever want Scott to take a 2 point jumper (Mcneal shooting 28% has a higher expected value than Scott shooting a 2 point jumper, think about that).
cincrulz11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2020, 08:42 AM   #100
skyblade
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,790
skyblade is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by cincyguy13 View Post
Diarra also looked terrible at the beginning of the year but you wanted him in there. Guess people think Harvey could also get better. But since he’s not your favorite player, I guess He can’t improve.
Diarra has been an excellent defender and rebounder all season. He was terrible on the offensive end, but I felt he could figure it out relatively quickly. He's a third year player and was much more likely to make the jump in understanding (which he has). Not only that, but his combination of size/athleticism allows him to recover from mistakes.

Harvey is a good athlete, but not close to Diarra's level. He lacks in all three phases of the game (offense, defense, rebounding). You can play a guy who lacks in one phase (such as Diarra, McNeal, Jaevin and Vogt at times), but you can't play a guy who lacks in a all three. Harvey will get there eventually, but I see no reason to think it will be this season.
skyblade is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., - All material on this Cincinnati Bearcat discussion forum is strictly for entertainment purposes only. This site and any pages within are in no way affiliated with the University of Cincinnati. Any images, copyrights, or trademarks used on this site are used under the "Fair Use Provision" of the Copyright Act for purposes of comment, criticism, and news reporting.