2016 General Recruiting

[L-T]

Originally Posted by coachpipe

We dont have zero recruits. We have 11 scholarship players. 10 that can play. The same number as Xavier, SMU, Purdue, Kansas and if i really wanted to look at all other P5 or decent basketball schools, im sure I could find more

How about we wait until the first day of classes before we bitch about the roster

"Zero" recruits was a reference to the spring signing period which has in fact come and gone with "zero" recruits. I am not bitching about the roster. Haven't said a word about it. I actually like the roster for this coming year but feel we needed to supplement it in this spring period to solidify our chances for that illusive "special" season. So, everything you said was pretty much irrelevant to any of my earlier points.

[L-T]

Originally Posted by Bearcat513

"General recruiting" thread turns into Cronin bashing just like every other thread on this site.

Anyone has any news or leads as to UC and potential recruits? Otherwise, there shouldn't be posts in this thread.

Below was your post from yesterday with "Bearcatnation" discussing pace of play. Don't see a single word in here about recruiting. You and Bearcatnation are both complaining about my posts being unrelated to recruiting and you both are off topic. Why don't you follow your own advice. This pace of play crap gets discussed in every thread. Is anyone enjoying this?

"I agree BearcatNation. Probably did not express that too well but I like seeing us run it against the lesser competition and then matching the pace to others. Efficiency is differently our biggest issue as a team. We can take time off the clock and then take a bad shot or miss an open one. The offense needs to have better spacing, more fluent movement and crisper passing."

[JasonS]

Originally Posted by L-T

Below was your post from yesterday with "Bearcatnation" discussing pace of play. Don't see a single word in here about recruiting. You and Bearcatnation are both complaining about my posts being unrelated to recruiting and you both are off topic. Why don't you follow your own advice. This pace of play crap gets discussed in every thread. Is anyone enjoying this?

"I agree BearcatNation. Probably did not express that too well but I like seeing us run it against the lesser competition and then matching the pace to others. Efficiency is differently our biggest issue as a team. We can take time off the clock and then take a bad shot or miss an open one. The offense needs to have better spacing, more fluent movement and crisper passing."

Two wrongs don't make a right. This thread needs to get back on topic.

[#BearcatNation]

I'm just hoping for a decent JuCo at this point, preferably a 4 or 5. I remember landing Ellis and Cobb with little to no public sign of it. Hadn't even heard we were going after them till I saw a "_____ has committed to UC" tweet. Maybe something like that will happen again. I'd love another DeBerry.

[Bearcat513]

Originally Posted by #BearcatNation

I'm just hoping for a decent JuCo at this point, preferably a 4 or 5. I remember landing Ellis and Cobb with little to no public sign of it. Hadn't even heard we were going after them till I saw a "_____ has committed to UC" tweet. Maybe something like that will happen again. I'd love another DeBerry.

That's probably the only chance we have of getting another player for this coming season. Otherwise, I feel like we will pocket the scholarships, unfortunately.

[Bearcat513]

Originally Posted by L-T

Below was your post from yesterday with "Bearcatnation" discussing pace of play. Don't see a single word in here about recruiting. You and Bearcatnation are both complaining about my posts being unrelated to recruiting and you both are off topic. Why don't you follow your own advice. This pace of play crap gets discussed in every thread. Is anyone enjoying this?

"I agree BearcatNation. Probably did not express that too well but I like seeing us run it against the lesser competition and then matching the pace to others. Efficiency is differently our biggest issue as a team. We can take time off the clock and then take a bad shot or miss an open one. The offense needs to have better spacing, more fluent movement and crisper passing."

I hate myself for even responding to this childish post. Going through the thread to try and "catch" me talking off topic? C'mon. If you read the previous posts, we were discussing the need of PLAYERS who are more efficient. And what is the means of attaining those more efficient players? Recruiting.

Sorry for not explicitly stating, " RECRUITING OPINION AHEAD" on each of my posts. I'm moving on from this discussion so please don't respond. I will ignore any further posts regarding anything unrelated to recruiting in this thread.

[ME80]

Originally Posted by #BearcatNation

Does every thread have to bash Mick? My goodness. Is anyone enjoying this anymore?

Haven't really enjoyed this since the season ended

[Ryno99]

So moving on, does anyone know when Cumberland and Brooks will be on campus to start their work out program and interacting with the other players?

[L-T]

Originally Posted by JasonS

Two wrongs don't make a right. This thread needs to get back on topic.

This is a "General" Recruiting thread. Every single post I made was on the topic of recruiting, which fits within the realm of "General". So, it's not two wrongs. It's only one, and mine wasn't wrong.

[waterhead]

Originally Posted by L-T

"Zero" recruits was a reference to the spring signing period which has in fact come and gone with "zero" recruits. I am not bitching about the roster. Haven't said a word about it. I actually like the roster for this coming year but feel we needed to supplement it in this spring period to solidify our chances for that illusive "special" season. So, everything you said was pretty much irrelevant to any of my earlier points.

Cane Broome.