Go Back   BearcatTalk.com > Cincinnati Football > Bearcat Football

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-05-2010, 06:19 PM   #1
swg
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,155
swg is a jewel in the roughswg is a jewel in the roughswg is a jewel in the rough
The SEC Evil Empire?

Right now I should be studying for my 2 law school exams here at Alabama Law, which I have to take before next Wednesday (even though I graduate this weekend). But you canít help it when epiphany strikes. It has struck me, and there isnít anything I can do right now other than put this into words. Here is why the SEC should expand and expand further than anyone has yet suggested. The new SEC (which will probably be renamed the College Football Champions League) will dominate college football, the cash cow of college athletics, and no other conference will ever again be able to say that it is a better football conference than the SEC. Ever.

In 1992, the SEC changed the game by becoming a 12 team league. Mike Slive should pull a Chancellor Palpatine and go one step further to create the SEC Empire this go around. The new SEC will have 20 teams. Yes, 20. And before you start your "Wait a minutes" and your "Buts" read how the new set-up will work, and why for every team in the SEC, new and old, this could not be a better idea. Currently the projection is for the Big 10 to add 5 teams: Nebraska, Mizzou, Pitt, Syracuse and Rutgers/WV (Google it: some news sites are already reporting it). The Pac-10 rumor right now is that Colorado and Utah will join to give them 12 teams. This means that both the Big 12 and Big East would lose three teams without the SEC lifting a finger. Should this happen, the SEC should already have in place its own plans for expansion. Read about what those plans should be after the jump:





There will 4 divisions within the new SEC, each with 5 teams. The divisions are the North, South, East & West. It is easiest to break the divisions down starting with West and moving east so I will do so following the table of Divisions.

West
South
North
East

Arkansas
Alabama
Kentucky
Florida

Oklahoma
Auburn
South Carolina
Georgia

Oklahoma State
LSU
Tennessee
FSU

Texas
Mississippi
Vanderbilt
Georgia Tech

Texas A&M
Mississippi State
Notre Dame/Clemson
Miami


Yes I am leaving Clemson out initially. Adding Clemson only helps Clemson, no one else. Notre Dame says no, Clemson can come along too.

Scheduling goes as follows. You play every team in your division once (4 games). You play a rival not in your division every year (1 game). You play 1 team from every other division rotating through them (3 games), which equals your 8 conference games. Instead of a conference championship game, you now have 2 playoff semi-final games to get to the conference championship game. Every playoff fanatic now has a defacto playoff in the SEC between all but 2 previous BCS champions (Ohio St. and USC) and the bowl games stick around, b/c letís be honest, every bowl game is going to want an SEC team playing in it (except the Rose, which wants USC v. Ohio St.).

As for the playoff games, here is who they are between and which city hosts them

West v. South rotates between
North v. East Rotates between
Championship rotates between

New Orleans
Atlanta
Atlanta

Dallas
Nashville
Birmingham

Birmingham (new dome!)
Any FL city that wants it
New Orleans


CharlotteÖprobably not
NashvilleÖprobably not




Think about this for a minute. What games are actually lost by switching the conferences into this divisional format? What team can say that they will truly lose a game that their fans care about winning or look forward to every year? The only one is FL-TN, and letís be honest here, the game is only a rivalry b/c of Spurrier and Fulmer; neither is the coach now, and it began less than 2 decades ago. No one really cares anymore, it just happened to decide the east winner for more than a decade, and the fans did care about that. All in all, more rivalries will be gained by this format than will be lost by it.

Bonus for the SEC: If the divisions are broken down as such, there is a possibility, not a likely one, but a possibility for up to 8 SEC teams could finish the regular season with zero or one losses and in the national championship picture. Each division winner and runner up could possibly have only lost to the division champion of another division and/or each other, making the SEC playoffs more thrilling than bowl season and March madness combined. The SEC could make up more than 50% of the top ten at all times during the year.

The West (The old Big 12 South + Arkansas)
1. Arkansas 2. Oklahoma 3. Oklahoma State 4. Texas 5. Texas A&M

This division is made up of what used to be the traditional best of the Big 12 South/Big 8/SWC. Arkansas is absolutely thrilled to have an actual rival in SEC, and to be honest, Arkansas only cared about playing these teams before joining. If you could ask these 5 teams individually, if I could be in a division in any conference with only the teams that I wanted to play/who were my rivals, who would be in it? The consensus from all of them would be each other, save maybe throw Nebraska/Mizzou in there. This division comes together for a few reasons.

1. The SEC growing its national footprint/TV marketÖ more money for the conference

2. The dissolution of the Big 12: The rumor is that Mizzou and Nebraska are going North to the Big 10 and Colorado is going West to the Pac 10. Sure this leaves Texas Tech, Kansas and Kansas St. without a home, but they arenít exactly football powerhouses either, and the schools joining donít really care about whom gets left behind. Sorry Tubbs.

3. Every team coming from the Big 12 would get more money in this division, even with the uneven revenue pools in the Big 12. So financially, this makes sense for all schools involved.

4. The Bowl scenarioÖ which will be explained in full later, but the winner of this division is guaranteed a BCS bid in the Fiesta Bowl, if not the National Championship game. (These teams take the Big 12ís Auto-Bid with them)

There is a possibility that this division could include LSU and Missouri if the Oklahoma schools decide not to come, but I donít see why they wouldnít. Also if the Texas schools also decide against coming, then Mississippi and Mississippi State would also be in the West. Worst case scenario is adding TCU/SMU or moving Vandy instead of adding Mizzou while none of the Texas/Oklahoma schools come. This division will always have at least 2 previous BCS Champions in it (unless worst case scenario), which makes the champion of this division worthy of a trip to Tempe for the Fiesta Bowl.

The South (the old SEC West)
1. Alabama 2. Auburn 3. LSU 4. Mississippi 5. Mississippi State

This is the SEC West minus Arkansas. All teams involved will be very happy with this because.

1. The SEC growing its footprint equals dolla dolla bills. Iím not sure what the negotiations would be, but my guess is that it would be at least 20 mil per school, possibly 25.

2. It just became easier to win the division, subtracting Arkansas from the equation. True, it became much more difficult to win the league, but I think these teams will be OK with all of the expansion for the following reason

3. The winner of this division goes to the Sugar Bowl, if not the National Championship game. Ok, yeah, Bama might not be thrilled with this, but every other team sure as hell is. A guaranteed BCS birth for beating your most hated rivals in the SEC. A BCS birth for being better than 4 other teamsÖyeah theyíll take that deal.

4. Auburn and Alabama are still stuck without their "other" main rivals in Georgia and Tennessee, but in the current system they are stuck without them, so it really isnít changing much, other that they wonít have to play Florida but twice every 8/10 years in the regular season. Of course they will have to play Ga. Tech, FSU, (GA for AL) and Miami. They both are appeased by getting to keep Georgia and Tennessee as their rivals they play every year from another division.

There is a possibility that this division could shift somewhat, being called the Central division instead of South, if the Big 12 stays put in part or in whole. LSU could go West, which would invite Tennessee or more likely Vanderbilt to the central. If the both the Mississippi schools go West as well (if the Big 12 saying no), then the division looks like this: 1. Auburn 2. Alabama 3. Tennessee 4. Kentucky 5. Vanderbilt. Either way, this division will always have 2 previous BCS champions in it, making it worthy of a trip to New Orleans for winning it.

The North (The basketball division)
1. Kentucky 2. South Carolina 3. Tennessee 4. Vanderbilt 5. Notre Dame/Clemson

If there is a flaw with this expansion, this division is it. This division will more than likely end up with the weakest of the SEC East schools. The reason that it will work though is because it does have a previous BCS champion (Tennessee) and its weakness is what will entice Notre Dame to join the SEC. The reasons this will work are:

1. DOLLA, DOLLA, DOLLA BILLS. Notre Dame is the key here for this division to work. The only school eligible to pull off a national TV deal on its own will mean multiple G5 airplanes for all schools involved if this goes down.

2. If Notre Dame comes, it will want some kind of perceived preferential treatment. Getting the 2 SEC cupcakes in its division is precisely that. If they don't, then Clemson comes, which gives this division all rivals... which I guess makes up for it being so weak.

3. The winner of this division gets an automatic birth into the newest BCS game (which is either the Citrus or Cotton Bowl) if not the National Championship game. Both of these bowls have as much if not more history and tradition than the Fiesta, it is time that they were afforded the same lofty status of BCS. As the newest BCS game, you get relegated the weakest SEC division.

4. The only reason this works this way is b/c Kentucky and Vanderbilt are already a part of the SEC. Like it or not, their opinion matters. As a result it is hard to imagine them not in a division with Tennessee, seeing as Tennessee is the only team that either of them care about playing. Tennessee has no problem being in the easy division, b/c that just makes it easier to win for them. They will still have to play Alabama every year, as well as a team from the East and West, which arenít exactly cake walks like their own division.

Another problem with this division is what happens to it if part or all of the Big 12 decides to stay situated. Tennessee, followed by Kentucky and Vanderbilt would be moved to the South (renamed the Central). Notre Dame isnít a guarantee to come either without the other prestigious schools from the Big 12. The only constant for this division seems to be that South Carolina will probably always be in it. Letís start with likelihoods first.

1. IF Notre Dame doesnít come, Clemson joins this division. Simple

2. IF LSU goes West (Ĺ of Big 12 South says no), Vanderbilt goes South, Clemson joins this division. Simple

3. IF both of the above happen (Vanderbilt and Notre Dame arenít in this division)

a. Virginia and Virginia Tech join this division OR

b. Clemson and West Virginia/Louisville join this division

4. IF All of the Big 12 South says no (This division goes back to scratch)

a. This division will become part of the ACC absorption that is discussed below, b/c Notre Dame more than likely isnít coming without Texas and Oklahoma to add to the prestige.

The East (whoever Florida and Georgia want)
1. Florida 2. Georgia 3. Florida State 4. Georgia Tech 5. Miami

This division is far more cutthroat than what the SEC North is shaping up to be at first glance. I think this will work because of the amount of prestige that will go along with just being in this division. Every team in this division despises the rest of the teams, without exception. The only problem will be getting Georgia and Florida to give their rivals the pay increase and prestige increase that comes along with joining a division with them, which in turn will help their enemiesí recruiting as well. The reasons why this would work though:

1. This division would be the only division in college football with THREE previous BCS CHAMPIONS. Let that sink in for a minute. A 5 team division with 3 BCS champions in it. Unfortunately, thatís also the biggest problem as well. But these teams already all play each other, just not every team against each other like it will be. GA always plays GT and FL. FL always plays GA and FSU and sometimes UM. GT always plays FSU, UM and GA. FSU always plays UM, FLA and GT. UM always plays FSU and GT and sometimes FL. Heck, it is easier to say GT doesnít play FL and GA doesnít play Miami or FSU. Thatís it. It just makes sense for these teams to quit bickering and join the same division already and make the games means a little more.

2. The winner of this division is guaranteed the Orange Bowl at the leastÖ AND if the division winner plays in the National Championship game, the runner-up then automatically gets to play in the Orange Bowl. Thatís how you settle the bickering. You give the teams a reason to join this insanely competitive division. Automatic BCS game for 2nd place if the champ goes onto play for it allÖyeah thatís a pretty good incentive. Out of these 5 schools, granted some have had their down years, but there hasnít been a year in my BCS memory where at least 2 of these schools werenít deserving of a BCS game.

3. All of the other Florida schools will never match the prestige of the Big 3. South Florida will no longer be on any players map for where they want to play football, if they receive an offer from one of these schools. I donít know why South Florida thinks that they should be in this discussion anyways. They have been playing football for maybe a decade. Maybe.

4. Oh yeah, money, thatís the real reason for all of this.

There are obviously some serious problems here.

1. The first and foremost being that Georgia Tech left the SEC b/c it didnít like Alabama cheating. So there is that question of if they will return, because Alabama, along with every other school in the country, still cheats. My bet is they will for the paycheck and prestige. Bobby Dodd would roll over in his grave, but I can see GT returning to the SEC.

2. Will Florida allow FSU and Miami to join? Again my guess would be yes, because of the money that Florida will receive by allowing them to join. As much as the administration can see problems with letting them join, the fans want it as well. One thing I could see is FL allowing FSU and not allowing Miami. That would lead to South Carolina or Clemson joining the division (maybe Tennessee as well) with more ACC schools joining the North division, as discussed below.

ACC take-over (if the Big 12 South says thanks, but no thanks)
This would mean that 4 teams in the Big 12 South didnít want to abandon their old SWC/Big 8 friends and leave them high and dry. Why they wouldnít want to join the empire is beyond be, but here is the scenario if that happens and the SEC decides to not go West. That leaves 8 spots from the Big East/ACC that need to be filled. If the SEC doesnít go West, I donít see Notre Dame joining the conference.

West
Central
North
South

Arkansas
Alabama
Virginia
Florida

Mississippi
Auburn
Virginia Tech
FSU

Mississippi State
Kentucky
South Carolina/North Carolina
Miami/South Carolina

LSU
Tennessee
Clemson/Duke
Georgia

Vanderbilt
ND/Louisville
West Virginia/NC State
Georgia Tech/Clemson




If Florida and Georgia block their instate schools, the only way to go is to Tobacco road at that point. But once we are considering basketball schools for a football takeover, we arenít really getting our moneyís worth on expansion. If that happened though, Clemson and South Carolina move to the South. Duke and North Carolina as well as NC State move into the North. Notre Dame isnít coming at this point and West Virginia possibly replaces Louisville in the central, or is left out all together.

www.teamspeedkills.com
swg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 10:03 PM   #2
swg
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,155
swg is a jewel in the roughswg is a jewel in the roughswg is a jewel in the rough
Not one comment? I thought this was an excellent piece. It may be a little much, and too grandiose in scale (again, ND won't join a conference until it's too late for them)...but the idea is game-changing. Much more than the Big11 is planning.
swg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 10:09 PM   #3
JasonS
Football Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,181
JasonS has a spectacular aura aboutJasonS has a spectacular aura aboutJasonS has a spectacular aura about
I didn't read the whole thing because it kind of lost me part way through. There are just too many things in there that won't happen IMO. The idea of a 20 team conference is not crazy, but this person's wish list is a little much.
JasonS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 10:11 PM   #4
swg
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,155
swg is a jewel in the roughswg is a jewel in the roughswg is a jewel in the rough
Yeah, it's the football conference version of Jerry Ma-fuc...nguire's manifesto. Or was it a memo??
But, college kids are known for living in a world that doesn't have to make sense. Still, while I'm not a fan of the SEC at all (for many reasons), it's an idea with merit, plus...it's got balls.
swg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
conference, expansion, sec


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., - All material on this Cincinnati Bearcat discussion forum is strictly for entertainment purposes only. This site and any pages within are in no way affiliated with the University of Cincinnati. Any images, copyrights, or trademarks used on this site are used under the "Fair Use Provision" of the Copyright Act for purposes of comment, criticism, and news reporting.