11-19-2017, 10:40 PM | #131 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17,011
|
|
11-19-2017, 11:29 PM | #132 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,583
|
IF they would have continued to actually run offense the last 6 minutes, they could have won by 20. But instead played to not lose and ended a little closer.
I like that team, outside of its mental mistakes. Quinton Rose is uber talented but still very raw. I really like their back up PG. Also I saw Obi get some buckets at the rim which he wasn't capable of before. thought his defense was bad though |
11-19-2017, 11:30 PM | #133 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,583
|
Tulane about to pass up Memphis in Kenpom.
|
11-20-2017, 06:41 AM | #134 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4,633
|
it seems like the league is better this year. It still isn't great and teams will still have questionable losses but I think it will be much better. If uconn and Temple can at least be bubble teams or NIT teams, thats already much better than last year. Tulane doesn't look like the worst team in college basketball. that a plus.
|
11-20-2017, 10:36 AM | #135 | |
Epic Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,583
|
Quote:
|
|
11-20-2017, 11:00 AM | #136 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17,011
|
Tulsa needs to get rid of Frank Haith. Each season with him just pushes them further and further away from relevance. They have to fire him, make the right hire, then hope they get decent 3-4 years later. Gonna be rough for them until then.
|
11-20-2017, 02:54 PM | #137 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
|
|
11-20-2017, 05:47 PM | #138 |
Epic Member
|
Jacob, so do you watch WSU on the regular? Do you root for them outside UC? This is my first time really watching them besides the UK game. I think they do a lot of things right and have some active quality bigs and obviously a really good guard. You think we will beat them at least once?
|
11-20-2017, 05:56 PM | #139 | |
Elite Member
|
Quote:
Unfortunately that seems to be a metric they really value |
|
11-21-2017, 04:09 PM | #140 |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
|
Found this tidbit on how road wins are going to carry more value than in the past with the committee. Basically what is being said here is that a top 30 win at home is equal to a top 50 win on a neutral site and a top 75 road win. And so on down the line. In the past I think a top 50 win was a top 50 win whether at home or on the road. It also sounds like the committee will use more of a composite of several metrics to make these determinations. I think UC would have benefited with this last year.
Column 1: Home games against teams ranked 1-30, neutral games vs. top-50 teams, road games against top-75 teams Column 2: Home games against teams ranked 31-75, neutral games vs. 51-100, road games vs. 76-135 Column 3: Home games against teams ranked 76-160, neutral games vs. 101-200, road games vs. 136-240 Column 4: Home games against teams ranked 161-351, neutral games vs. 201-351, road games vs. 241-351 |
Bookmarks |
|
|