Go Back   BearcatTalk.com > Cincinnati Basketball > Bearcat Basketball

View Poll Results: Who wins?
Bearcats by 1-5 points 0 0%
Bearcats by 6-10 points 6 50.00%
Bearcats by 11+ points 6 50.00%
Golden Hurricanes by 1-5 points 0 0%
Golden Hurricanes by 6+ points 0 0%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-25-2019, 12:55 PM   #31
justinhub2003
Epic Member
 
justinhub2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,583
justinhub2003 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by cincrulz11 View Post
thats not really a choice. teams will let him shoot them until his arms fall off. even if he shoots them at 40%, which is good for college at mid-range, every defense will be ok with that. it also takes our 2nd best offensive rebounder on the floor at any given time (assuming we never play with eli, brooks, and scott) away from the rim.

Imo his mid range jumper is just a build up until he ultimately is able to step out and be a 3 point threat.

Gary Clark did it. Gary started with the mid range and just kept. Icing further back until it was ultimately part of his game.

Gary got a year head start on it because he had no one in front of him but imo Trevon has a chance to shoot the 3 like Kyle Washington or Gary Clark next season.

The thing with Tre so far is that he is either on or off. When he is on, he makes every jump shot he takes. When he is off, his shot is flat.
justinhub2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2019, 01:17 PM   #32
cincycpaw
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,680
cincycpaw will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by justinhub2003 View Post
Imo his mid range jumper is just a build up until he ultimately is able to step out and be a 3 point threat.

Gary Clark did it. Gary started with the mid range and just kept. Icing further back until it was ultimately part of his game.

Gary got a year head start on it because he had no one in front of him but imo Trevon has a chance to shoot the 3 like Kyle Washington or Gary Clark next season.

The thing with Tre so far is that he is either on or off. When he is on, he makes every jump shot he takes. When he is off, his shot is flat.
Yup I get it. I still hate it early in the shotclock. Always will. Really a long 2 by anyone with more than 15-18 seconds on the shitclock is just bad basketball.

But you are right. When Scott makes 1, its like he can’t miss hardly.
cincycpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2019, 01:26 PM   #33
mdchick
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,638
mdchick is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by cincrulz11 View Post
thats not really a choice. teams will let him shoot them until his arms fall off. even if he shoots them at 40%, which is good for college at mid-range, every defense will be ok with that. it also takes our 2nd best offensive rebounder on the floor at any given time (assuming we never play with eli, brooks, and scott) away from the rim.
Keith Williams is the second best offensive rebounder on our team
mdchick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2019, 05:58 PM   #34
cincrulz11
Epic Member
 
cincrulz11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,329
cincrulz11 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdchick View Post
Keith Williams is the second best offensive rebounder on our team
the numbers dont say so. KW is good for a guard on the offensive glass, but he doesn't put up big man rebounding stats.
cincrulz11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2019, 06:06 PM   #35
cincrulz11
Epic Member
 
cincrulz11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,329
cincrulz11 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by justinhub2003 View Post
Imo his mid range jumper is just a build up until he ultimately is able to step out and be a 3 point threat.

Gary Clark did it. Gary started with the mid range and just kept. Icing further back until it was ultimately part of his game.

Gary got a year head start on it because he had no one in front of him but imo Trevon has a chance to shoot the 3 like Kyle Washington or Gary Clark next season.

The thing with Tre so far is that he is either on or off. When he is on, he makes every jump shot he takes. When he is off, his shot is flat.

he just looks so uncomfortable out there. i never got that vibe from gary.


i agree when scott is on he's on, and when he's not, well he's not. his previous 15 games he was shooting 32.7% from midrange. also he's shooting 62% from the FT line if you just take out that one 12-13 game (which happens to be his career average too).
cincrulz11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2019, 08:41 AM   #36
mdchick
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,638
mdchick is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by cincrulz11 View Post
the numbers dont say so. KW is good for a guard on the offensive glass, but he doesn't put up big man rebounding stats.
Offensive rebounding is not tre’s forte he doesn’t get good position on the post, kw doesn’t need position he just out jumps people
mdchick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2019, 08:57 AM   #37
cincrulz11
Epic Member
 
cincrulz11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,329
cincrulz11 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdchick View Post
Offensive rebounding is not tre’s forte he doesn’t get good position on the post, kw doesn’t need position he just out jumps people

but even then Scott is at 8.2 OR% and williams is at 6.8.



in 7 conference games williams has 7, and scott has 14.



scott is by no means great at it, but he's not terrible. i think we just usually have so many great offensive rebounders we forget what average looks like.
cincrulz11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2019, 10:00 AM   #38
skyblade
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,790
skyblade is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by cincrulz11 View Post
but even then Scott is at 8.2 OR% and williams is at 6.8.



in 7 conference games williams has 7, and scott has 14.



scott is by no means great at it, but he's not terrible. i think we just usually have so many great offensive rebounders we forget what average looks like.
As a team we are at 34.7%, which is good enough for 19th in the NCAA. Last years 37.5% was tied for first. We aren't so much average as no longer quite as awesome.

Brooks is at 12.1%, same as Clark was last year and much better then KW was last year.

Scott's 8.2% is comperable to Washington's 8.3% last year.

Williams 7.0% is quite a bit better then Evans 5.2% last year.

If Scott can get back close to his ORB% last year, we will be in good shape. Although we still have the weakness of his backup(s). Fredericks is actually putting up good rebounding numbers (9.1% ORB), but that's about the only thing he has done well. Moore is at only 2.8%, which is about what I'd expect from him given his size and athleticism (or lack there of). But terrible for the 4 spot when we play small lineups.
skyblade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2019, 10:12 AM   #39
cincrulz11
Epic Member
 
cincrulz11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,329
cincrulz11 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyblade View Post
As a team we are at 34.7%, which is good enough for 19th in the NCAA. Last years 37.5% was tied for first. We aren't so much average as no longer quite as awesome.

Brooks is at 12.1%, same as Clark was last year and much better then KW was last year.

Scott's 8.2% is comperable to Washington's 8.3% last year.

Williams 7.0% is quite a bit better then Evans 5.2% last year.

If Scott can get back close to his ORB% last year, we will be in good shape. Although we still have the weakness of his backup(s). Fredericks is actually putting up good rebounding numbers (9.1% ORB), but that's about the only thing he has done well. Moore is at only 2.8%, which is about what I'd expect from him given his size and athleticism (or lack there of). But terrible for the 4 spot when we play small lineups.



I didn't mean average as a team, I just meant Scott is average for a big. Brooks and Nsoseme are both very good. KW is good for a guard.
cincrulz11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., - All material on this Cincinnati Bearcat discussion forum is strictly for entertainment purposes only. This site and any pages within are in no way affiliated with the University of Cincinnati. Any images, copyrights, or trademarks used on this site are used under the "Fair Use Provision" of the Copyright Act for purposes of comment, criticism, and news reporting.