03-13-2014, 01:38 PM | #131 | |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,329
|
Quote:
Because the RPI isn't used a the dominant factor anymore. SMU has a much better kenpom/bpi than nebraska. and Louisville is #5 in bpi and #2 on kenpom. |
|
03-13-2014, 01:41 PM | #132 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: #DumpMick
Posts: 7,333
|
Of all the metrics, RPI has been the worst in predicting both seeds and likelihood of making the NCAA tournament. Actually the polls have been better indicators...
|
03-13-2014, 01:54 PM | #133 |
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 717
|
As much as I hate the RPI, the committee still uses it to compare resumes. No one outside of ESPN cares about the BPI.
|
03-14-2014, 12:15 PM | #134 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: North College Hill
Posts: 369
|
I know Lunardi's bracketology isn't that great at predicting seeding and regions, but I like that current draw he has us in now. Ohio State in the round of 32, wichita st. In sweet 16. I think those matchups really work to our advantage. Seeing Kansas in the elite 8 would be tough but they've shown they aren't unbeatable. Thoughts on those potential matchups?
|
03-14-2014, 12:36 PM | #135 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
Of all the 1 seeds I would prefer to play Wichita St, unless Nova somehow holds on to a 1. |
|
03-14-2014, 01:00 PM | #136 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: #DumpMick
Posts: 7,333
|
Jerry Palm said UC and Louisville are still in play for a #1 seed. Michigan was one of the teams we needed to lose to jump over.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|