UCLA

[BCM]

Originally Posted by Nayers

Don't be so down on them. Committee had an agenda. They should have been playing a 4 seed in round 2. And i'd venture to say ucla was no 3 seed. It was all in hopes to see the ucla uk rematch. It's all good.

NEXT YEAR, we will have 5 totally competent offensive players starting!

Is it next year yet

It has been next year every year for the last 5 years

[Jon Rycek]

Originally Posted by dbieon12

Fair enough. I only show up for the real games not the cupcake AAC matchups. 30 wins in the AAC is like 23-24 back in the Big East days. It's what I would expect again next year.

You also didn't show up in this game til cats were down 6 points so...

[bearcat1518]

Originally Posted by jacobkdoyle

You only post here during losses so you have zero credibility on the matter. Sorry. That's just how it is.

30 win season
2nd most wins in school history
Undefeated at home
15 game winning streak
16-2 in conference
30-6 overall
Conference title game

Meh. Just ok. Lol. C'mon man.

Agreed w above. Great season for sure. But at some point we have to win some big games, right? (SMU was a good win this year, but you know what I'm saying...)

[cincyguy13]

Cumberland was great. Him, Evans and Clark have to be aggressive next year. Should have a great team next year

[Bearcat513]

I'm not ready for this board's trash ass hot takes about this team or the coach or the program.

[Nayers]

Originally Posted by UClaw89

I have no complaints about this season. We acquited ourselves well tonight in a road game against the best offense in the country. Held them to 11 below their average. The shortcoming was Troy. This was his team to carry or drop and today he was not good enough. The good news is that we laid the groundwork for an awesome senior year for Clark and Washington with Jennifer at the helm. We will be much better next year and would love to see UCLA again then. For now I hope UCLA thrashes Kentucky.

Good thoughts, though I would say Brooke will be at the helm as the starter, but potentially a very solid backup

[dbieon12]

Originally Posted by Nayers

Don't be so down on them. Committee had an agenda. They should have been playing a 4 seed in round 2. And i'd venture to say ucla was no 3 seed. It was all in hopes to see the ucla uk rematch. It's all good.

NEXT YEAR, we will have 5 totally competent offensive players starting!

Yeah. Not sure why Cronin thought it was a good idea to call out the committee a week before the selection show.

[ZCat]

Dang, dang, dang

[Bcatfollower]

Originally Posted by dbieon12

Don't want to start the 'Cronin' talk. He's a good coach but seems to get 80-90% out of the team every year.

We'll see if Brooks can beat out Washington next year. Washington faded hard as the year went on.

He faded in the big games. What were his stats at Rhode island, butler, smu final?

[cincyguy13]

Originally Posted by bearcat1518

Agreed w above. Great season for sure. But at some point we have to win some big games, right? (SMU was a good win this year, but you know what I'm saying...)

I think we all agree. It's hard and ucla has better players. I would love to win something once tho