02-21-2017, 07:36 PM | #11 |
Football Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,181
|
|
02-22-2017, 05:41 AM | #12 | |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
|
Quote:
The problem is our road Offense seems endemic to the coach or maybe a group of players. I didn't go back any further than last year. |
|
02-22-2017, 06:04 AM | #13 | |
Epic Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4,633
|
Quote:
|
|
02-22-2017, 07:45 AM | #14 |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
|
I have no idea how to explain it really. In terms of shooting % only...we haven't been this highly ranked #51 overall (or even close to it really) I mean we all know we have been a terrible shooting team under Cronin because we didn't recruit the basketball players only the athletes (until recently). So I looked back about 7 years for the home and road shooting % through SK's senior year with Jackson and back to Gates, Wright, Dixon as well. Cronin's 7 most productive years.
These numbers are from teamrankings.com 2017...rank #51 overall...51.2% home...40.2% road...(11.0 difference) 2016...rank #215 overall...46.5%...39.1%...(7.5) 2015...rank #92 overall...46.7%...42.3%...(4.5) 2014...rank #247 overall...44.1%...40.4%...(3.5) 2013...rank #296 overall...41.2%...39.2%...(2.0) 2012...rank #228 overall...42.4%...41.8%...(.5) 2011...rank #145 overall...44.3%...43.1%...(1.0) Some interesting notes. The last three years have seen the biggest splits. It looks like an average team in NCAA would have a 3-4% differential home to road. In all 7 years the road % hovered between 43.1% ad 39.1% (4 point spread) and even our best year is an average year at best in NCAA on the road. Our worst years are absolutely horrible including last year our worst year and this year our third worst year. Home shooting % saw a 10 point spread from best to worst year from 41.2% to 51.2%. This year is our high mark by almost 5%...over the previous two years which were also higher than the rest by 2 %. Home shooting has gone way up and road shooting has held steady over the years for the most part. What is really weird is that the ups and downs of home shooting haven't corresponded to road shooting at all really. Our best three years at home (which are the last 3) have seen 2 of the worst 3 years on the road. It makes no sense. Last edited by waterhead; 02-22-2017 at 08:24 AM. |
02-22-2017, 08:03 AM | #15 | |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
|
Quote:
|
|
02-22-2017, 08:21 AM | #16 |
Elite Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 520
|
PLEASE keep in mind - of all below 100 teams Cincy has played, 14 of 19 have been at home. Of top 100 teams, 2 of 8 games have been at home.
|
02-22-2017, 08:30 AM | #17 | |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
|
Quote:
The one constant, even with better shooters added in this year, is that we still aren't good at shooting on the road. |
|
02-22-2017, 08:42 AM | #18 | |
Epic Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4,633
|
Quote:
|
|
02-22-2017, 08:56 AM | #19 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: #DumpMick
Posts: 7,333
|
Mick seems fixated on making road games grinders for whatever reason. Teams ordinarily do perform slightly worse on the road but Cincinnati's splits are dramatic. At home, they look like one of the best offensive teams in the country (and the numbers bear that out) but on the road they look awful. Something definitely needs to change.
|
02-22-2017, 09:10 AM | #20 | |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
|
Quote:
Temple home...81-74...away 56-50 Tulane home...92-56...away 78-61 Tulsa home...80-60...away 57-55 USF home...94-53...away 68-54 SMU home...66-64...away 51-60 Average score at home 82.6...away 62.0. It would seem to me we definitely change philosophy/psychology on the road. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|