02-18-2019, 11:07 AM | #51 |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,395
|
Weekly update:
4. Houston (Q1,Q1) 24. Mississippi St (Q1) 27. Cincinnati 30. Ole Miss (Q1) 40. UCF (Q1,Q2) 44. Ohio St (Q2) 53. Temple (Q1) 64. Memphis (Q1,Q2) 74. Tulsa (Q1,Q2) 78. South Florida 82. UConn (Q2) 95. Xavier 106. SMU (Q2) 110. NKU 114. UCLA 115. Wichita St (Q2) 146. George Mason 160. UNLV 255. East Carolina (Q4) |
02-18-2019, 11:44 AM | #52 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,655
|
Cincy NET Resume:
Q1: 4-2 Q2: 2-1 Q3: 9-0 Q4: 6-1 Remaining Regular Season Games: Q1: 2 (@UCF, Houston) Q2: 4 (UCF, @UConn, @SMU, Memphis) Q3: N/A Q4: N/A |
02-25-2019, 09:03 AM | #53 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,655
|
Weekly Resume Update
Record: 23-4 (12-2 AAC) Current Seed Projection: 7 seed (Bracket Matrix) Q1: 3-2 Q2: 5-1 Q3: 9-0 Q4: 6-1 Remaining Regular Season Games: Q1: 2 (@UCF, Houston) Q2: 2 (@SMU, Memphis) Q3: N/A Q4: N/A |
02-25-2019, 09:38 AM | #54 |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,395
|
4. Houston (Q1-A,Q1-A)
24. Cincinnati 25. Mississippi St (Q1-A) 34. UCF (Q1-A,Q2) 38. Ole Miss (Q1) 42. Ohio St (Q2) 50. Temple (Q1) 60. Memphis (Q1,Q2) 72. South Florida (Q2) 84. Xavier 93. Tulsa (Q2) 96. Wichita St (Q2) 97. UConn (Q2) 109. SMU (Q2) 110. UCLA 160. UNLV 253. East Carolina (Q4) NKU and George Mason are 50 spots away from Q2. Not worth tracking them anymore. |
02-25-2019, 10:59 AM | #55 |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
|
We are doing a good job of winning basketball games so we look good for our quadrant wins and losses but we are doing a poor job with our metrics.
We were ranked #19 after the ECU loss (per T-rank). We are now ranked #31 after winning 11 of 12 games. The Houston loss dropped us only 1 spot. So in the other 11 wins we have dropped a total of 11 spots. Every game since Tulsa we have either lost ground or stayed about even. That includes 6 out of 7 wins. Eeking out wins is not enough to move seed lines. But I guess it's better than the alternative. |
02-25-2019, 11:09 AM | #56 | |
Epic Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,329
|
Quote:
the offense has been bad. our adjo on bartorvik is 111.7 and we'v been under that 5 of the last 6 games and 10 of 13 games since the Tulane game. |
|
02-25-2019, 11:37 AM | #57 | |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
|
Quote:
I just don't understand why Cumberland needs to run around so much to get open either. Just hand the ball off to him or keep it in his hands if we want him with the ball. I don't think we need to run him off screens the entire possession just to get the ball to him. Let him take some plays off and just draw attention to create space for other guys to make plays. It's hard to deny him the ball on a handoff or if he brings the ball up the court. He can dribble around for 10 seconds at the top of the key to get some rest if we want to. Stop all this rocker motion back and forth base line running for him. It seems unnecessary to me and it's going to tire him out. |
|
02-25-2019, 01:40 PM | #58 |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,395
|
Guy's, let's please try to keep this thread on the topic of NET rankings. Plenty of other places to talk about Cumberland and efficiency.
|
02-26-2019, 02:06 AM | #59 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,183
|
|
03-04-2019, 10:54 AM | #60 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,655
|
Weekly Resume Update
Record: 25-4 (14-2 AAC) NET: 21 Current Seed Projection: 7 seed (6.43 avg on Bracket Matrix) Q1: 4-2 Q2: 6-1 Q3: 9-0 Q4: 6-1 Remaining Regular Season Games: Q1: 2 (@UCF, Houston) Q2: N/A Q3: N/A Q4: N/A Potential AAC Tournament Opponents: Q1: Houston, UCF Q2: Memphis, Temple, South Florida, Wichita, UConn, Tulsa Q3: SMU Q4: East Carolina, Tulane |
Bookmarks |
|
|