Go Back   BearcatTalk.com > Cincinnati Basketball > Bearcat Basketball

View Poll Results: How would you like to use it for 18-19?
JUCO recruit 8 33.33%
HS recruit 2 8.33%
Graduate transfer 11 45.83%
Non-graduate transfer (sits out 18-19) 2 8.33%
Save it for Class of '19 recruit 1 4.17%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-03-2018, 12:51 PM   #31
waterhead
Senior Moderator
 
waterhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
waterhead is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by indydoug View Post
When Jennifer was recruited--as I remember-- he was the PG we hadn't had--one who could penetrate and dish and speed up tempo. Am I misremembering that or has he just been Caupain-ed?
I don't want to remember this but yes. He was. He was supposed to be the quick PG superior passer and ball handler. And he is. We can't use him like he is now. Pass around the perimeter. He's too small.

We need Jenifer...the one we recruited.
waterhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2018, 12:51 PM   #32
cincyguy13
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4,633
cincyguy13 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by indydoug View Post
When Jennifer was recruited--as I remember-- he was the PG we hadn't had--one who could penetrate and dish and speed up tempo. Am I misremembering that or has he just been Caupain-ed?
Yeah, this Is where some question cronin recruiting. Why recruit a 5’7 player who’s strength is up tempo and passing in the open court and make him play a slow pace half court game. If it’s a half court game, he gives you nothing
cincyguy13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2018, 02:24 PM   #33
Bearcatboy
Epic Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Amelia, Ohio
Posts: 2,108
Bearcatboy is on a distinguished road
Cincinnati, Vanderbilt, Stanford and Virginia Tech are the latest to become involved with Utah State guard Koby McEwen, per source. A top transfer prospect this spring
Bearcatboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2018, 02:44 PM   #34
mdchick
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,638
mdchick is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by cincyguy13 View Post
If a players strength is that he takes charges, that’s not a very good player. He gives you nothing on offense. One of the reasons Nevada came back. Didn’t even guard him when he was on the court.
Cane Broome played worse in that game than Jenifer did
mdchick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2018, 03:11 PM   #35
GarradJ21
Epic Member
 
GarradJ21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,725
GarradJ21 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdchick View Post
Cane Broome played worse in that game than Jenifer did
If JJ was to be a grad transfer he would go to a mid major school in order to start and be "the guy." That's the easiest way to explain it.

no chance a P5 school would take him unless he was cool with play ten minutes or less a game and that would be at Wake Forest. That should be our mindset too. JJ should not be the Cincinnati Bearcats starting PG. It's that simple.

Deonta Vaugh
Cashmere Wright
Troy Caupain

Now... Justin Jennifer...come on

Last edited by GarradJ21; 04-03-2018 at 03:15 PM.
GarradJ21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2018, 03:48 PM   #36
cincyguy13
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4,633
cincyguy13 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdchick View Post
Cane Broome played worse in that game than Jenifer did
I didn’t say anything about Cane Broome.
cincyguy13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2018, 08:12 PM   #37
mdchick
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,638
mdchick is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by cincyguy13 View Post
I didn’t say anything about Cane Broome.
You said jj was the reason we lost, and if he had a better game than Cane Broome than what does that tell you?
mdchick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2018, 05:56 AM   #38
cincyguy13
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4,633
cincyguy13 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdchick View Post
You said jj was the reason we lost, and if he had a better game than Cane Broome than what does that tell you?
I did not say Jj was the reason we lost. I said the fact they didn’t have to guard him was a reason. There were many reason. Stop making things up
cincyguy13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2018, 02:03 PM   #39
indydoug
Senior Member
 
indydoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 348
indydoug is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by cincyguy13 View Post
I did not say Jj was the reason we lost. I said the fact they didn’t have to guard him was a reason. There were many reason. Stop making things up
Why do we say opponents don't have to guard Jennifer? He's a career 36% shooter from 3 which is better than Cumberland and Moore.
indydoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2018, 02:20 PM   #40
cincyguy13
Epic Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4,633
cincyguy13 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by indydoug View Post
Why do we say opponents don't have to guard Jennifer? He's a career 36% shooter from 3 which is better than Cumberland and Moore.
Why would you guard him? His career ppg is 2, 2, and 4. He went a bout a month without scoring a point this year. Are you saying they didn’t just leave him in the game against Nevada? Go watch it again. (I don’t recommend that)
cincyguy13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., - All material on this Cincinnati Bearcat discussion forum is strictly for entertainment purposes only. This site and any pages within are in no way affiliated with the University of Cincinnati. Any images, copyrights, or trademarks used on this site are used under the "Fair Use Provision" of the Copyright Act for purposes of comment, criticism, and news reporting.