new metric

**sedziobs** · 02-18-2019, 11:07 AM

Weekly update:

4. Houston (Q1,Q1)
24. Mississippi St (Q1)
27. Cincinnati
30. Ole Miss (Q1)
40. UCF (Q1,Q2)
44. Ohio St (Q2)
53. Temple (Q1)
64. Memphis (Q1,Q2)
74. Tulsa (Q1,Q2)
78. South Florida
82. UConn (Q2)
95. Xavier
106. SMU (Q2)
110. NKU
114. UCLA
115. Wichita St (Q2)
146. George Mason
160. UNLV
255. East Carolina (Q4)

Queens_NYC · 02-18-2019, 11:44 AM

Cincy NET Resume:

Q1: 4-2

Q2: 2-1

Q3: 9-0

Q4: 6-1

Remaining Regular Season Games:

Q1: 2 (@UCF, Houston)

Q2: 4 (UCF, @UConn, @SMU, Memphis)

Q3: N/A

Q4: N/A

Queens_NYC · 02-25-2019, 09:03 AM

Weekly Resume Update

Record: 23-4 (12-2 AAC)

Current Seed Projection: 7 seed (Bracket Matrix)

Q1: 3-2

Q2: 5-1

Q3: 9-0

Q4: 6-1

Remaining Regular Season Games:

Q1: 2 (@UCF, Houston)

Q2: 2 (@SMU, Memphis)

Q3: N/A

Q4: N/A

**sedziobs** · 02-25-2019, 09:38 AM

4. Houston (Q1-A,Q1-A)
24. Cincinnati
25. Mississippi St (Q1-A)
34. UCF (Q1-A,Q2)
38. Ole Miss (Q1)
42. Ohio St (Q2)
50. Temple (Q1)
60. Memphis (Q1,Q2)
72. South Florida (Q2)
84. Xavier
93. Tulsa (Q2)
96. Wichita St (Q2)
97. UConn (Q2)
109. SMU (Q2)
110. UCLA
160. UNLV
253. East Carolina (Q4)

NKU and George Mason are 50 spots away from Q2. Not worth tracking them anymore.

**waterhead** · 02-25-2019, 10:59 AM

We are doing a good job of winning basketball games so we look good for our quadrant wins and losses but we are doing a poor job with our metrics.

We were ranked #19 after the ECU loss (per T-rank). We are now ranked #31 after winning 11 of 12 games. The Houston loss dropped us only 1 spot. So in the other 11 wins we have dropped a total of 11 spots. Every game since Tulsa we have either lost ground or stayed about even. That includes 6 out of 7 wins.

Eeking out wins is not enough to move seed lines. But I guess it's better than the alternative.

cincrulz11 · 02-25-2019, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by waterhead

We are doing a good job of winning basketball games so we look good for our quadrant wins and losses but we are doing a poor job with our metrics.

We were ranked #19 after the ECU loss (per T-rank). We are now ranked #31 after winning 11 of 12 games. The Houston loss dropped us only 1 spot. So in the other 11 wins we have dropped a total of 11 spots. Every game since Tulsa we have either lost ground or stayed about even. That includes 6 out of 7 wins.

Eeking out wins is not enough to move seed lines. But I guess it's better than the alternative.

the offense has been bad. our adjo on bartorvik is 111.7 and we'v been under that 5 of the last 6 games and 10 of 13 games since the Tulane game.

**waterhead** · 02-25-2019, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cincrulz11

the offense has been bad. our adjo on bartorvik is 111.7 and we'v been under that 5 of the last 6 games and 10 of 13 games since the Tulane game.

Yah...maybe we should try to put the ball in the hands of the other guards a little more. If the other teams are going to gravitate 2 or even 3 players towards Cumberland we should be able to get some nice 4 on 3 action out there. If we are being played straight up then Cumberland is the guy.

I just don't understand why Cumberland needs to run around so much to get open either. Just hand the ball off to him or keep it in his hands if we want him with the ball. I don't think we need to run him off screens the entire possession just to get the ball to him. Let him take some plays off and just draw attention to create space for other guys to make plays.

It's hard to deny him the ball on a handoff or if he brings the ball up the court. He can dribble around for 10 seconds at the top of the key to get some rest if we want to. Stop all this rocker motion back and forth base line running for him. It seems unnecessary to me and it's going to tire him out.

**sedziobs** · 02-25-2019, 01:40 PM

Guy's, let's please try to keep this thread on the topic of NET rankings. Plenty of other places to talk about Cumberland and efficiency.

Jon Rycek · 02-26-2019, 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedziobs

Guy's, let's please try to keep this thread on the topic of NET rankings. Plenty of other places to talk about Cumberland and efficiency.

Lol, as little conversation is happening on this board is it that big of a deal.

Queens_NYC · 03-04-2019, 10:54 AM

Weekly Resume Update

Record: 25-4 (14-2 AAC)

NET: 21

Current Seed Projection: 7 seed (6.43 avg on Bracket Matrix)

Q1: 4-2

Q2: 6-1

Q3: 9-0

Q4: 6-1

Remaining Regular Season Games:

Q1: 2 (@UCF, Houston)

Q2: N/A

Q3: N/A

Q4: N/A

Potential AAC Tournament Opponents:

Q1: Houston, UCF

Q2: Memphis, Temple, South Florida, Wichita, UConn, Tulsa

Q3: SMU

Q4: East Carolina, Tulane

02-18-2019, 11:07 AM	#51
sedziobs Senior Moderator Join Date: Jan 2018 Posts: 2,395	Weekly update: 4. Houston (Q1,Q1) 24. Mississippi St (Q1) 27. Cincinnati 30. Ole Miss (Q1) 40. UCF (Q1,Q2) 44. Ohio St (Q2) 53. Temple (Q1) 64. Memphis (Q1,Q2) 74. Tulsa (Q1,Q2) 78. South Florida 82. UConn (Q2) 95. Xavier 106. SMU (Q2) 110. NKU 114. UCLA 115. Wichita St (Q2) 146. George Mason 160. UNLV 255. East Carolina (Q4)

02-18-2019, 11:44 AM	#52
Queens_NYC Epic Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Posts: 1,655	Cincy NET Resume: Q1: 4-2 Q2: 2-1 Q3: 9-0 Q4: 6-1 Remaining Regular Season Games: Q1: 2 (@UCF, Houston) Q2: 4 (UCF, @UConn, @SMU, Memphis) Q3: N/A Q4: N/A

02-25-2019, 09:03 AM	#53
Queens_NYC Epic Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Posts: 1,655	Weekly Resume Update Record: 23-4 (12-2 AAC) Current Seed Projection: 7 seed (Bracket Matrix) Q1: 3-2 Q2: 5-1 Q3: 9-0 Q4: 6-1 Remaining Regular Season Games: Q1: 2 (@UCF, Houston) Q2: 2 (@SMU, Memphis) Q3: N/A Q4: N/A

02-25-2019, 09:38 AM	#54
sedziobs Senior Moderator Join Date: Jan 2018 Posts: 2,395	4. Houston (Q1-A,Q1-A) 24. Cincinnati 25. Mississippi St (Q1-A) 34. UCF (Q1-A,Q2) 38. Ole Miss (Q1) 42. Ohio St (Q2) 50. Temple (Q1) 60. Memphis (Q1,Q2) 72. South Florida (Q2) 84. Xavier 93. Tulsa (Q2) 96. Wichita St (Q2) 97. UConn (Q2) 109. SMU (Q2) 110. UCLA 160. UNLV 253. East Carolina (Q4) NKU and George Mason are 50 spots away from Q2. Not worth tracking them anymore.

02-25-2019, 10:59 AM	#55
waterhead Senior Moderator Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 9,298	We are doing a good job of winning basketball games so we look good for our quadrant wins and losses but we are doing a poor job with our metrics. We were ranked #19 after the ECU loss (per T-rank). We are now ranked #31 after winning 11 of 12 games. The Houston loss dropped us only 1 spot. So in the other 11 wins we have dropped a total of 11 spots. Every game since Tulsa we have either lost ground or stayed about even. That includes 6 out of 7 wins. Eeking out wins is not enough to move seed lines. But I guess it's better than the alternative.

02-25-2019, 01:40 PM	#58
sedziobs Senior Moderator Join Date: Jan 2018 Posts: 2,395	Guy's, let's please try to keep this thread on the topic of NET rankings. Plenty of other places to talk about Cumberland and efficiency.

03-04-2019, 10:54 AM	#60
Queens_NYC Epic Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Posts: 1,655	Weekly Resume Update Record: 25-4 (14-2 AAC) NET: 21 Current Seed Projection: 7 seed (6.43 avg on Bracket Matrix) Q1: 4-2 Q2: 6-1 Q3: 9-0 Q4: 6-1 Remaining Regular Season Games: Q1: 2 (@UCF, Houston) Q2: N/A Q3: N/A Q4: N/A Potential AAC Tournament Opponents: Q1: Houston, UCF Q2: Memphis, Temple, South Florida, Wichita, UConn, Tulsa Q3: SMU Q4: East Carolina, Tulane