Mick Cronin

[cincrulz11]

Originally Posted by Bcatfollower

By that logic there is no reason to keep him. Just pay some high school coach 30k a year to coach them because they can’t compete in the current college basketball landscape.

That’s not how that logic works. They are competing, maybe not for national titles, but how many teams realistically are?

[Alum2013]

Originally Posted by Jon Rycek

We have 2/3 of the top 3pt shooters in program history. I don’t know how this is even still an argument

Are you slow? We have 2 shooters and then everyone else on the team is me and you out there shooting 3s. Are your bearcat blinders really that overwhelming you can't figure it out?

[cincrulz11]

Originally Posted by Jon Rycek

We have 2/3 of the top 3pt shooters in program history. I don’t know how this is even still an argument

Only having 2 guys over 31% is bad even if they were both really good. It’s tough to play offense like that unless you’re hyper athletic. If we had 1 more shooter it really would have made it easier on Cumberland

[Bcatfollower]

Originally Posted by cincrulz11

That’s not how that logic works. They are competing, maybe not for national titles, but how many teams realistically are?

That’s exactly how logic works. If they don’t think they can win why even play in the tournament. Hang it up after the conference tourney. Your statements are bizarre

[Jon Rycek]

Originally Posted by Bcatfollower

That’s exactly how logic works. If they don’t think they can win why even play in the tournament. Hang it up after the conference tourney. Your statements are bizarre

So you think all 68 teams have a chance to win it all? Come on man

[cliftonballer]

Originally Posted by Alum2013

Are you slow? We have 2 shooters and then everyone else on the team is me and you out there shooting 3s. Are your bearcat blinders really that overwhelming you can't figure it out?

I just can't even with this fanbase anymore. It's like they wipe their memory banks clean after every season's abrupt end. Everyone besides the insane diehard fans know we don't have shooters that's why we're so easy to gameplan for and nobody reepects us. I'm surprised nobody's talked about Fran schooling Mick in this thread being the main factor we lost to Iowa.

[cliftonballer]

Originally Posted by cincrulz11

Only having 2 guys over 31% is bad even if they were both really good. It’s tough to play offense like that unless you’re hyper athletic. If we had 1 more shooter it really would have made it easier on Cumberland

We just need to get tougher and play better defense. Basketball is not about putting a ball in a hoop.

[TheRealMick]

Not having shooters wasn't our problem. We need basketball players with some length to play in mick system. 4 or 5 yrs isnt enough time to teach team full of projects how to play basketball. Moore and fredricks need be shown the door and two transfers take their spots.

[TheRealMick]

I remember when Mick had to choose between demar and Eugene land. Demar was a pro and land went on to become all American. No way moore or fredricks be on next year playing significant minutes if we can upgrade their roster spots.

[cincyguy13]

Originally Posted by TheRealMick

Not having shooters wasn't our problem. We need basketball players with some length to play in mick system. 4 or 5 yrs isnt enough time to teach team full of projects how to play basketball. Moore and fredricks need be shown the door and two transfers take their spots.

Agree, if Moore can't make shots, he literally gives you nothing. Teams weren't even guarding him toward the end of the year. At least Fredrick's can make a layup and get a rebound sometimes.