04-27-2021, 01:36 PM | #791 |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,395
|
If DDJ does leave, we'll only have one player slated to graduate in each of the next two seasons. We already have five players with 4 years of eligibility left. Bringing in any more young players will give us extremely unbalanced classes. We might be looking at a somewhat active incoming and outgoing transfer portal over the next several years.
|
04-27-2021, 02:50 PM | #792 |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,395
|
McGinnis shot 53% from three in his prep year. Seems to be a pure shooter and a gym rat like Mason. So right now at the 2/3 spots, we have a couple of defense first players in MAW and Newman, paired with a couple of shooting threats in Madsen and McGinnis. Hopefully Wes has a winning combination there.
|
04-27-2021, 02:56 PM | #793 | |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
|
Quote:
|
|
04-27-2021, 07:23 PM | #794 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,790
|
I think that DDJ is going to transfer. The longer it takes for him to make a decision, the more likely it seems he will transfer. Wes can't recruit as if DDJ is staying if he hasn't committed, because then there would be no replacement on roster if DDJ leaves. He has to recruit as if DDJ is going to transfer and by doing so, makes it more likely DDJ transfers. Same is true for Lakhin.
That said. MAW, DDJ, Saunders, Mason, Newman and McGinnis is 6 players for 3 positions if we assume JD is staying at the 4 (and Hensley is a 4). That's not too many minutes to go around. Currently we have (roughly, since some players play multiple positions): PG: DDJ (SR), Saunders (SO) SG: MAW (JR), Mason (SO) SF: Newman (JR), McGinnis (SO), Banks (JR) PF: JD (JR), Hensley (SO) C: Koval (SR), Lakhin (SO) The two big concerns are the lack of a freshman class and the lack of an strong interior big man (or two). Koval is going to be pushed around in the American, Lakhin is an unknown and the JD/Hensley combo at the 4 probably isn't going to be grabbing a ton of boards. If we assume DDJ and Lakhin aren't coming back, there is still room to add another guard and a couple of bigs. |
04-27-2021, 08:43 PM | #795 | |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,395
|
Quote:
For class balancing I think the problem is we have too big of a freshman class. Saunders, Madsen, McGinnis, Hensley, and Lakhin each have four years of eligibility remaining, the same as an incoming freshman would have. It's a big problem at guard, since we have four guys (Saunders, Madsen, McGinnis, MAW) who ideally play the two guard spots and have 3+ years left. That's going to make it tough to recruit new guards in the next couple years, and we'll have to replace all of them after that. If DDJ leaves and we bring in another young wing or PG, the problem just gets worse. I agree that Wes needs to plan for DDJ's departure though. Ideally we have a senior transfer in mind who can play point, unless Wes is confident enough that MAW or Mason can handle it. |
|
04-28-2021, 11:13 AM | #796 | |
Epic Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,790
|
Quote:
I guess it will come down to individual circumstances, but I don't think we should assume they will all (or even most) use the extra year. |
|
04-28-2021, 11:23 AM | #797 | |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
|
Quote:
I am not too worried about how many guards we have. That will work itself out somehow. I only worry about playing small if Koval is the only big to rebound. |
|
04-28-2021, 11:42 AM | #798 | |
Epic Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,790
|
Quote:
Biggest concern is definitely big men. If Koval is more than a 15-20 minute guy, we have problems. Who knows with Lakhin, perhaps Wes really likes him. But he doesn't seem to have the foot speed to deal with some of the bigs in the American. I'm starting to get a bit worried about facing Houston or Memphis and just getting dominated on the boards to the point where we have no chance. Koval is at best equal to Vogt in rebounding and quite possibly a downgrade. Lakhin I'd say best case around Vogt level as well. Hensley downgrade from Eason on the boards. JD may end up leading us in rebounds and while I love JD, that's not ideal. We need a big or two who can get after it on the boards. Worst case scenario we get a freshman and develop him. Maybe we are a bad rebounding team next year, I can deal with that (not expecting a ton). But I want to at least have a guy on the roster who can become a top rebounder, even if he needs work before he gets there. |
|
04-28-2021, 11:57 AM | #799 |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,395
|
None of us can predict the future, but it seems like most players without pro potential are using their extra year. I don't think any of our guards have pro potential, they're all undersized. Redshirts usually stick around and play for four years afterwards. This situation isn't much different than that. Anyone can transfer now, not just graduates. So any incoming freshman will be in the same situation as the guys who just played their first year. From a rules/eligibility standpoint, they're all in the same class.
Regardless of how you want to classify them, we have five players (three guards) with 4 years of eligibility. Even if last year's freshmen do leave after their 4th year, we are still loaded with guards for the next several years. It's going to be tough to recruit to that position. We're talking to another guard with 4 years. If we used our remaining scholarships (incl. Banks) to bring in a typical 3 man freshman class we would have eight! This roster construction points toward transfers being pushed out in a couple years, or huge turnover in 4 years with not much room for incoming freshmen until then (especially guards). It can work, but it's not ideal. Right now it seems like it could work because we're assuming a SG will get significant minutes at SF. And since these guys are all young, we're probably going to have to continue doing that for several years. If DDJ leaves but we want to bring in McMillan at point, we're right back to the same situation. |
04-28-2021, 12:18 PM | #800 | |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,298
|
Quote:
But even though CWM talks about players not transferring I would imagine we could still see 1 or 2 rather than 4 or 5. Especially from the guard stable. And even more especially if we land another guard/wing this year. I am also quite sure Wes has had a conversation with DD about how he's going to have to keep recruiting until he hears about two feet in. If he hears two feet in from DD then we probably start focusing on bigs and maybe still a wing/guard but not a PG. |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|