12-04-2013, 02:19 PM | #91 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 316
|
Quote:
As for the rest, I'm sorry but blocks are not just blocks. Some require a 6'11 guy to simply put his hand up to a 6'1-6'3 guard driving the ball. You think Buchanon would last long jumping out of the gym like Jackson for his? A space eater isn't inherently a stiff, he moved okay but his rebounds weren't out of his area or anything. He got those boards on virtue of his size. Kid wasn't crazy athletic or pulling acrobatic feats to get them. |
|
12-04-2013, 02:24 PM | #92 | |
Epic Member
|
Quote:
|
|
12-04-2013, 02:25 PM | #93 |
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 845
|
I find this whole schedule argument stupid. We can't change anything so no need to get worked up over it. Only thing we can control is attendance. Go to the games no matter who we play. Go watch OUR team - not our opponent. Yea, some games are flat out terrible to watch at times, and I would love for the powerhouse teams to come to Fifth Third too, but it isn't going to happen like many want. With the way this team plays defense and hustles, they deserve more fans to show up. If you can't appreciate just watching our team play I don't know what to tell you, regardless of opponent.
Everyone that wants us to play more local small schools are assuming those teams want to come here and play or have open spots on their schedule. Nobody here knows what goes on behind the scenes when putting the schedule together. I'm sure Mick isn't telling OU, Kent State, or WKU thanks but no thanks. And please, adding NKU, Bowling Green, Evansville, etc. isn't going to add thousands to our attendance or create any more buzz. There are only a handful of mid-majors that could do that. You also have to remember that some of those MAC-type schools would want a 2 for 1 series. Off the top of my head I know we had to play at Wright State, UAB, Miami, Marshall and Toledo in recent years. Not saying we are above everyone else and should refuse to play those teams on the road, but what would people say if we lost to one of those teams on the road? I'd guess a lot would question why we played them at their arena in the first place. Yes we will need to schedule tougher with the new conference, especially next year without Louisville, but like Jack said, this isn't a video game where you can play any team, anywhere, on any date at any time. Money, TV, location, arena availability, calendar date, and more things have to add up. |
12-04-2013, 02:36 PM | #94 | |
Epic Member
|
Quote:
|
|
12-04-2013, 02:38 PM | #95 |
Epic Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,595
|
I remember before the season even started and everyone was talking about the schedule saying that with a lot of fresh faces that the weak start would be just what the team needs. If the soft part of the schedule got the frosh's feet wet, and allowed some chemistry to take place than is it worth it? Especially if we play with the confidence and the smothering defense we did last night and get into the NCAA, the schedule could be useful. This is definitely the softest part of the schedule, it gets a lot tougher now. We still have about 25 games to play, it is definitely a marathon.
__________________
"Every day we are day-to-day." Coach Cronin |
12-04-2013, 02:47 PM | #96 | |
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 845
|
Quote:
|
|
12-04-2013, 03:06 PM | #97 |
Elite Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,030
|
Well, I'm glad some of you are perfectly happy with watching crappy, no-name teams come to Fifth Third. There is nothing wrong with having some cupcakes on your schedule, and yes, it is good for the young guys. But this early stretch is ridiculous. The games against the North Carolina teams were a part of a pre-season tournament, so I understand that. It was a great 4-game stretch to get the young guys acclimated, with one respected opponent on national television sprinkled in there.
But if you want to see attendance rise, you can't follow that up with UMass-Lowell, Kennesaw State, and USC Upstate. I am CERTAIN that we can get teams like Miami and Ohio to play us at Fifth Third. If it is a 2 for 1, so be it. Playing Dayton would be good for RPI and great for both fan bases. It will put butts in the seats at both of our arenas. Are they not asking us to play? Then let's ask them! Be proactive. Replace 2 of those 3 garbage games with any combination of Miami, Ohio, NKY, Wright State, or Dayton and you're looking at much higher attendance and better RPI potential without making your schedule a murderer's row. |
12-04-2013, 03:07 PM | #98 |
Elite Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,030
|
And I still think playing 7 straight games at home to open the season is silly. Spread the home games out a little more and you might see an increase in attendance.
|
12-04-2013, 03:13 PM | #99 |
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 717
|
Expected OOC SOS: 125
That's better than teams such as Louisville (184), Pitt (200), and Indiana (240) to name a few. Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill. Sure, the schedule could improve, but this is far from a terrible OOC schedule. |
12-04-2013, 03:20 PM | #100 | |
Elite Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,030
|
Quote:
Pitt is in the ACC and Louisville will join them there next year. Indiana is in the Big Ten. And Indiana and Louisville have rabid fan bases with national names -- in other words, they can schedule whoever they want because fans will show up regardless. And all 3 have better arenas than we do. Plus, the Big Ten and ACC are arguably the best conferences in college basketball, so their OOC RPI isn't that important. The issue we were talking about though is attendance, and one obvious way to help attendance is to schedule better. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|